ƒата: 10-03-17 12:33
ANALYSIS: Airline support gathers around Boeing MoM concept
US airlines are increasingly showing firm interest in BoeingТs middle-of-the-market aircraft concept, which could replace many of the 757s and 767s that they continue to fly.
Executives from both Delta Air Lines and United Airlines spoke positively of the programme, dubbed the УMoMФ by some, as they look at their future aircraft needs in the roughly 200- to 260-seat segment at the ISTAT Americas conference in San Diego.
УIt has a lot of merit and, if they decide to launch it, weТd be very interested in considering it,Ф said Andrew Levy, chief financial officer of Chicago-basedUnited, at the conference.
Daniel Pietrzak, managing director of fleet management at Delta, agrees with LevyТs comments and elaborates a bit on what the carrier needs. УLook at it as a 757-300 capacity mission to something like a 767-200 Ц obviously new technology but with the size and range,Ф he says.
Both Delta and United, as well as their peer American Airlines, operate large fleets of 757s and 767s that they use for transatlantic and longer domestic missions. Together, the three carriers operate 258 757-200 and -300s, and 164 767-300ERs and -400ERs, the Flight Fleets Analyzer shows.
All three US carriers have largely replaced their domestic 757s and 767s with Airbus A321s and Boeing 737-900ERs.
John Kirby, vice-president of capacity planning at the Seattle-based carrier, says he sees a need at Alaska for an aircraft with 190 to 210 seats with a 4,000nm (7,400km) to 4,500nm range in the future Ц specifications that also fit Boeing's planned 737 Max 10 in seating capacity but not in range.
The specifications of the potential Boeing MoM Ц or in the words of Air Lease executive chairman Steven Udvar-Hazy: Уjust call it a 797Ф Ц are beginning to take shape, airlines and lessors say at ISTAT.
The twin-aisle aircraft, something Levy confirms for the first time, will have two variants with around 225 to 260 seats and a range of 4,800nm to 5,200nm.
УWe continue to study what that airplane would look like,Ф a spokesman for Boeing says on the MoM concept. УWeТre having very productive conversations with our customers and firming up opportunities there.Ф
Aengus Kelly, chief executive of AerCap, raises some of the issues that Boeing faces in ensuring that the potential aircraft meets the needs of the wider market, and not just the US carriers.
УThatТs the challenge they have to get it right Ц how do you fix that equation of meeting the mission capability of a global customer base, not just three airlines in North America,Ф he says at ISTAT. УIt has to have global capability.Ф
For example, Kelly says a 40,000lb-thrust (180kt) aircraft would be good for some carriers but not all, while a 45,000lb-thrust aircraft could meet more of the market demand but would be more expensive.
Boeing has previously said that it is looking at a power range of around 40,000lb-thrust for the MoM.
The airframer is currently seeking proposals from engine manufacturers for the MoM, says Kelly.
УIТm pretty confident there will be two engine [options] on the next generation Boeing,Ф says Udvar-Hazy on the self-coined 797. He adds that he expects there will be one option from General Electric and another from a Pratt & Whitney and Rolls-Royce consortium.
MARKET MAKER OR DUD?
The major US airlines, as Kelly points out, cannot drive the MoM programme alone. The aircraft would have to attract orders from carriers around the world to succeed, which raises questions about the larger market for a small twin-engined jet liner.
In July 2016, Boeing forecast a total market of 4,000 to 5,000 aircraft for a MoM-sized airplane but noted that the Airbus A321neo and A330neo would take a portion of this, leaving a demand for roughly 2,000 to 3,000 units.
УThereТll be a growing need for an aircraft in that category,Ф says Udvar-Hazy. УItТs not magnified today but if you look at the lifecycle of that airplane, there will be a need.Ф
Asked about Airbus' long-range variant of the A321neo, Levy says it "does a nice job but it doesnТt quite meet all the needs we have out of Newark".
Airbus, while agreeing that Boeing needs a clean-sheet aircraft in the middle-of-the-market segment, thinks a twin-aisle aircraft is the wrong idea.
УLight [twin-aisles] will never compete with a good single-aisle stretched airplane,Ф says John Leahy, chief operating officer for customers at the European airframer, at ISTAT. УAerodynamically and physically, the widebody will just have more weight and more drag for the loads that you're carrying.Ф
He points to the Airbus A310 and the 767-200 as examples of small twin-aisles that never met expectations.
At least one fleet manager at a major airline scoffs at LeahyТs comments, saying that a clean-sheet twin-aisle with todayТs composite and engine technology could certainly achieve the economics of a narrowbody.
УThereТs a lot of medium-sized aircraft demand, youТve just got to get the economics right,Ф they say.
»сточник информации: Flight Global
ќригинальные подарки авиационной тематики
ѕерепечатка материалов разрешаетс€ только при наличии гиперссылки на
ѕерепечатка, копирование, воспроизведение или иное использование материалов, в которых содержитс€ ссылка на агентства ”Ќ»јЌ, Iнтерфакс-”крањна, строго запрещено